DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#17 of 4670.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench case#30 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#21 of 3852.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026$2.85Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$14.25Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedSep 10, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi-K3
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · statistical tie4.8899% of row best · score · Deepseek V4.1 Flash (Max); 95% CI [3.54852933, 6.21109128]; sessions 20080; observations 2295632; rank 126.22100% of row best · score · Kimi K3 (Max); 95% CI [5.59393783, 6.84323085]; sessions 108615; observations 9086177; rank 8
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader83.20100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4.1-flash-max · 36,355 output tokens / case81.0297% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified88.03100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) · 18,199 output tokens / case88.19100% of row best · points · Kimi K3 · 15,023 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIZ.aiMiniMaxDeepSeekOpenAIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.050$0.100$0.500$1.006873798489Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)GPT-5.6 Sol (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Fable 5.1Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi-K3
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot AI
FamilyDeepseek V4 1Kimi K3
ModelDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi-K3
VersionDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-102026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters763.2B2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning
Architecture designCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)Unknown
Backbone parameters552000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during decode16000000000 parametersUnknown
Active parameters during prefill8000000000 parametersUnknown
Pre-training corpus45000000000000 tokensUnknown
Reasoning effort range1–100Unknown
Routed experts per MoE layer384 expertsUnknown
Routed experts per token6 expertsUnknown
Transformer layers40 layersUnknown

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 1,049K and Kimi K3 is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K3 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K and Kimi K3 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback