command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 vs Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Cohere | Meta |
| Family | Command A Plus 05 | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e |
| Model | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E |
| Version | command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-04-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200,000 | 10,000,000 |
| Total parameters | 218,750,277,872 | 108,641,793,536 |
| Active parameters | 25,000,000,000 | 17,000,000,000 |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, tools |
14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 Capabilities
Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | Command A VisionCohere | family variantsimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | ||
| vs | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | ||
| vs | Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 vs Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E FAQs
Is command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 and Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E has the larger sourced context window. command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 supports 200,000 and Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E supports 10,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 is open weight; Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E is open weight.
Can command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 and Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E understand images?+
command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 is documented with image input; Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 is 65,536 and Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E is —.
Do command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 and Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E support reasoning and tool use?+
command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16: tool calling and image input. Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E has 1, so Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, command-a-plus-05-2026-bf16 or Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.