Claude Sonnet 5 vs gpt-oss-20b

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#26 of 4660.1 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 40.0–73.4UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#29 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#30 of 3847.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 37.4–54.0UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.018Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$10.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.090Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,442.15100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1437.57467941, 1446.71829948]; votes 35301; rank 621,287.3289% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-20b; 95% CI [1280.92242279, 1293.71473349]; votes 10393; rank 246
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Sonnet 5gpt-oss-20b
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 5Gpt Oss
ModelClaude Sonnet 5gpt-oss-20b
VersionClaude Sonnet 5gpt-oss-20b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-30Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K131K
Total parametersUnknown20.9B
Active parametersUnknown3.6B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Serverless, Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Sonnet 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-5

gpt-oss-20b Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-oss-20b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 5 vs gpt-oss-20b FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

Claude Sonnet 5 is $2.00 and gpt-oss-20b is $0.018 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-20b is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 5 is $10.00 and gpt-oss-20b is $0.090 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-20b is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 5 supports 1,000K and gpt-oss-20b supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b be self-hosted?+

gpt-oss-20b is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Sonnet 5 is not marked open weight; gpt-oss-20b is open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 5 is documented with image input; gpt-oss-20b is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Sonnet 5 is 128K and gpt-oss-20b is —.

Do Claude Sonnet 5 and gpt-oss-20b support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. gpt-oss-20b: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

Claude Sonnet 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; gpt-oss-20b has 5, so gpt-oss-20b has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 5 or gpt-oss-20b?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback