Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8-Max
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8-Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · statistical tie7.48100% of row best · score · Claude Sonnet 5 (High); 95% CI [5.31247081, 9.65098366]; sessions 27467; observations 2696236; rank 86.0199% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [4.88117795, 7.13339178]; sessions 18386; observations 1372080; rank 14
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,442.9598% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1438.22001632, 1447.67497803]; votes 31096; rank 561,479.56100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1473.34740586, 1485.77213629]; votes 13136; rank 12
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,277.9497% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1269.73992861, 1286.14906472]; votes 8522; rank 291,312.86100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1304.57707433, 1321.13715544]; votes 7244; rank 6
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Sonnet 5Verified Aug 28, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.8 MaxVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8-Max
DeveloperAnthropicQwen
FamilyClaude 5Qwen3 8 Max
ModelClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8-Max
VersionClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-30Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknown2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Sonnet 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$10.00
Serving providers3
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.65
Output price$4.951
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Claude Sonnet 5 is $2.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 5 is $10.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Sonnet 5 is 1,000K and Qwen3.8 Max is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 5 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 5 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Sonnet 5 supports 128K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131K output tokens.

Do Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Claude Sonnet 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback