Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Why this pair: Consecutive Claude Sonnet releases

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-b2e2a31b3d53 · verified_score · leader63.6774% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)86.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-326661568d5f · verified_score · leader13.6123% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)60.42100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-07-30-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,446.1998% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929; 95% CI [1439.60004073, 1452.78970477]; votes 28634; rank 221,482.80100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1476.49799837, 1489.09368537]; votes 54427; rank 8
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,158.4695% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-search; 95% CI [1153.41447529, 1163.49714967]; votes 127378; rank 241,221.23100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6-search; 95% CI [1216.39472071, 1226.06821163]; votes 134905; rank 7
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,433.9598% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k; 95% CI [1431.13754052, 1436.75329939]; votes 81031; rank 791,458.01100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1454.41608210, 1461.60383515]; votes 66343; rank 32
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader77.2592% of row best · points · Claude Sonnet 4.5 · 2,441 output tokens / case83.63100% of row best · points · Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 2,525 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins6 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Sonnet 4.5Verified Sep 3, 2026
Anthropic · activeClaude Sonnet 4.6Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4Claude 4
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-09-292026-02-17
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-012025-08-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200,0001,000,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

15 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$3.00
Output price$15.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$3.00
Output price$15.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15.00 per million tokens, so they are tied on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200,000 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 6 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 64,000 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 128,000 output tokens.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 2, so Claude Sonnet 4.6 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback