Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#36 of 4627.7 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 18.5–51.8#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$15.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader63.6771% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader13.6121% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking 32K)65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,158.4696% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-search; 95% CI [1153.41447529, 1163.49714967]; votes 127378; rank 241,204.11100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1198.80874858, 1209.41102574]; votes 109553; rank 13
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,433.9499% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k; 95% CI [1431.13982742, 1436.74901697]; votes 80980; rank 811,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins4 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaude 4Grok 4 20
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2025-09-29Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2025-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $15.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 64K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 1 sourced provider route; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback