Model Markets
Get Free API KeyAPI

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs pi 0.7

At a Glance

Compare
pi 0.7Physical Intelligence
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Mythos 5.1pi 0.7
DeveloperAnthropicPhysical Intelligence
FamilyClaude 5 1pi
ModelClaude Mythos 5.1pi 0.7
VersionClaude Mythos 5.10.7
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-012026-04-16
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Robot state
Output modalitiesTextRobot action
Context window1,000KUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableNoUnknown
Provider accessAnthropic (Project Glasswing)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolscross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, language-steering, visual-subgoals
Robotics model typeUnknownVision-language-action model
Action representationUnknownContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal prompts
Control architectureUnknownHigh-level policy, world model, and action expert
Inference locationUnknownUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknownmobile manipulators, bimanual UR5e, multiple fixed manipulators
Training dataUnknownRobot demonstrations, autonomous data, egocentric human data, and multimodal web data described by the publisher.

Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-mythos-5-1

pi 0.7 Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationlanguage-steeringvisual-subgoals
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceUnknown
Action representationContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal prompts
Supported embodiments3
Canonical IDphysical-intelligence/pi-0.7

Related Comparisons

APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Claude Mythos 5.1 | Claude Platform DocsAnthropic · observed Sep 2, 2026pi 0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent CapabilitiesPhysical Intelligence · observed Aug 29, 2026

Questions

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs pi 0.7 FAQs

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and pi 0.7, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

Only Claude Mythos 5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $10.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Mythos 5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $50.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 1,000K and pi 0.7 is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7 be self-hosted?+

Neither model is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; pi 0.7 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and pi 0.7 understand images?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; pi 0.7 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 128K and pi 0.7 is —.

Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and pi 0.7 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. pi 0.7: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; pi 0.7 has 0, so Claude Mythos 5.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or pi 0.7?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback