Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Grok 4.6

Why this pair: Trusted-access Claude profile versus xAI's frontier model

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Mythos 5.1Verified Sep 2, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.6Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.6
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaude 5 1Grok 4
ModelClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.6
VersionClaude Mythos 5.1Grok 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-01Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-012026-02-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000,000500,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownxAI (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Mythos 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-mythos-5-1

Grok 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.6

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Grok 4.6 FAQs

Is Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

Only Grok 4.6 has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.6 has a directly sourced output price: $6.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Mythos 5.1 supports 1,000,000 and Grok 4.6 supports 500,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Mythos 5.1 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.6 understand images?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Mythos 5.1 is 128,000 and Grok 4.6 is —.

Do Claude Mythos 5.1 and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Mythos 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

Claude Mythos 5.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so Grok 4.6 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Grok 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback