Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Seed 2.0 Pro
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | ByteDance Seed |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Seed 2 0 |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Seed 2.0 Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-02-14 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
Seed 2.0 Pro Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Seed 2.0 Pro FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $5.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 200K and Seed 2.0 Pro is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Seed 2.0 Pro is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Pro understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Seed 2.0 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and Seed 2.0 Pro is —.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Seed 2.0 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Seed 2.0 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Seed 2.0 Pro has 0, so Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Seed 2.0 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.