Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.32Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.28Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.7-Plus
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,419.9798% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1414.09579972, 1425.83505080]; votes 34677; rank 371,444.14100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1435.12302267, 1453.16578005]; votes 4591; rank 30
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6496% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,454.20100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.75378609, 1458.63820942]; votes 39334; rank 39
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.7-Plus
DeveloperAnthropicQwen
FamilyClaude 4 5Qwen3 7 Plus
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.7-Plus
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.7-Plus
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-15Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Qwen3.7 Plus Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-plus

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $0.32 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Qwen3.7 Plus is $1.28 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.7 Plus is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and Qwen3.7 Plus supports 131K output tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Plus has 4, so Qwen3.7 Plus has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Plus?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback