Claude Haiku 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.050Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,396.64100% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 147 | 1,348.4497% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 195 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16 |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2025-12-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-11-28 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 31.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 3.5B |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 be self-hosted?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 1,049K output tokens.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.