Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.106IBM watsonx.ai ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 1K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | granite-embedding-278m-multilingual |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | IBM |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | granite-embedding-278m-multilingual |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | granite-embedding-278m-multilingual |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2024-12-18 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Embedding |
| Context window | 200K | 1K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 278M |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), IBM watsonx.ai (Pay as you go) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | embeddings |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is $0.106 per million tokens, so Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is cheaper on this metric. Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $5.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual supports 1K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual be self-hosted?+
Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual is —.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Granite Embedding 278m Multilingual?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.