Claude Haiku 4.5 vs gpt-oss-120b

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.037Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.17Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.64100% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,365.8798% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-120b; 95% CI [1361.49487468, 1370.23719284]; votes 29955; rank 176
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.15100% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case68.0190% of row best · points · gpt-oss 120B (high) · 7,577 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5gpt-oss-120b
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4 5Gpt Oss 120b
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5gpt-oss-120b
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5gpt-oss-120b
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-15Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K131K
Total parametersUnknown116.8B
Active parametersUnknown5.1B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Serverless, Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Serverless, Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

gpt-oss-120b Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers7
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs gpt-oss-120b FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and gpt-oss-120b, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.037 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and gpt-oss-120b is $0.17 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and gpt-oss-120b supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b be self-hosted?+

gpt-oss-120b is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; gpt-oss-120b is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and gpt-oss-120b understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; gpt-oss-120b is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and gpt-oss-120b is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and gpt-oss-120b support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. gpt-oss-120b: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; gpt-oss-120b has 7, so gpt-oss-120b has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or gpt-oss-120b?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback