Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic |  Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | automated-patching, cybersecurity, reasoning, vulnerability-detection |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a directly sourced output price: $5.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 200K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber has 0, so Claude Haiku 4.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.