Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.30Google AI · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$2.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6499% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,417.27100% of row best · rating · gemini-2.5-flash; 95% CI [1414.83704531, 1419.70406968]; votes 122732; rank 116
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.15100% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case72.1796% of row best · points · Gemini 2.5 Flash · 4,399 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaude 4 5Gemini 2 5
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-15Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-01-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Gemini 2.5 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-2.5-flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Gemini 2.5 Flash is $0.30 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Gemini 2.5 Flash is $2.50 per million tokens, so Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Gemini 2.5 Flash is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Gemini 2.5 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 66K output tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 2.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 2.5 Flash has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback