Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#28 of 4655.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.2
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#10 of 44$0.054 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#12 of 3858.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 49.2–65.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.66DeepSeek · Sep 2, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.5441Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6496% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,450.63100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1446.64622706, 1454.61308427]; votes 54130; rank 43
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1595% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case79.25100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro (xhigh) · 9,652 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaude 4 5Deepseek V4 Pro
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-04-24
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown1.6T
Active parametersUnknown49B
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and DeepSeek V4 Pro is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback