Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #2 of 4695.6 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #12 of 4676.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #44 of 44$1.01 per LiveBench case | #33 of 44$0.241 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #29 of 3847.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #19 of 3853.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 98.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (XHigh) | 94.0095% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.6 (120K, High) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 89.17100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (Max) | 69.1778% of row best · percent · Claude Opus 4.6 (120K, High) |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,496.0899% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1488.22135990, 1503.94311259]; votes 8497; rank 5 | 1,507.05100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6; 95% CI [1501.18336037, 1512.92390326]; votes 41260; rank 4 |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,230.2298% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1222.30895335, 1238.13609545]; votes 41795; rank 5 | 1,253.42100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6-search; 95% CI [1248.44594166, 1258.38585709]; votes 134699; rank 2 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,492.63100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1487.86770992, 1497.38399139]; votes 30057; rank 7 | 1,497.54100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6; 95% CI [1494.14263199, 1500.94441396]; votes 75878; rank 5 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,325.86100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1317.96760009, 1333.76174084]; votes 11304; rank 1 | 1,311.5499% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-6; 95% CI [1305.06259741, 1318.02420613]; votes 25140; rank 9 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 86.55100% of row best · percent · claude-fable-5-max-effort · 20,255 output tokens / case | 78.6991% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-6-thinking-auto-high-effort · 9,651 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 89.06100% of row best · points · Claude Fable 5 (xhigh) · 18,129 output tokens / case | 84.2195% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.6 · 13,556 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 3 ties | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead | 1 benchmark win |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Family | Claude 5 | Claude 4 |
| Model | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Version | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-02-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-05-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Fable 5 Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.6 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Fable 5 is $10.00 and Claude Opus 4.6 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5 is $50.00 and Claude Opus 4.6 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Fable 5 is 1,000K and Claude Opus 4.6 is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Fable 5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 7 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Fable 5 is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6 understand images?+
Claude Fable 5 is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5 is 128K and Claude Opus 4.6 is 128K.
Do Claude Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Opus 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
Claude Fable 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; Claude Opus 4.6 has 1, so Claude Fable 5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.