Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic |  GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #1 of 4699.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #13 of 4674.9 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #43 of 44$0.824 per LiveBench case | #35 of 44$0.266 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #22 of 3851.7 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #23 of 3851.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $2.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $12.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,050K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 97.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) | 96.5099% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 90.00100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | 83.9093% of row best · percent · GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) |
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | 13.71100% of row best · score · Claude Fable 5.1 (Max); 95% CI [11.98654915, 15.42403622]; sessions 13320; observations 1453463; rank 1 | 1.4489% of row best · score · GPT 5.6 Terra (xHigh); 95% CI [0.32735411, 2.55262103]; sessions 20301; observations 1231027; rank 23 |
| LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,512.58100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5.1-max; 95% CI [1497.40364732, 1527.76498981]; votes 1403; rank 2 | 1,471.5897% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-terra-xhigh; 95% CI [1463.31179298, 1479.85049651]; votes 5787; rank 13 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,507.58100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5.1-max; 95% CI [1499.42882565, 1515.73467375]; votes 5783; rank 1 | 1,446.2296% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-terra-xhigh; 95% CI [1441.41414497, 1451.02563541]; votes 28119; rank 52 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,322.34100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5.1-max; 95% CI [1310.08723910, 1334.59344910]; votes 2701; rank 2 | 1,269.9096% of row best · rating · gpt-5.6-terra-xhigh; 95% CI [1261.54272100, 1278.25950723]; votes 7726; rank 36 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 86.82100% of row best · percent · claude-fable-5-1-max-effort · 16,470 output tokens / case | 82.3195% of row best · percent · gpt-5.6-terra-max · 22,145 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 89.71100% of row best · points · Claude Fable 5.1 (max effort) · 60,786 output tokens / case | 86.3996% of row best · points · GPT-5.6 Terra (ultra) · 11,336 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 7 benchmark winsOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Family | Claude 5 1 | Gpt 5 6 |
| Model | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Version | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 | 2026-02-16 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,050K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Claude Fable 5.1 Capabilities
GPT-5.6 Terra Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Terra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 and GPT-5.6 Terra is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5.1 is $50.00 and GPT-5.6 Terra is $12.00 per million tokens, so GPT-5.6 Terra is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
GPT-5.6 Terra has the larger sourced context window. Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000K and GPT-5.6 Terra supports 1,050K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 7 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Fable 5.1 is not marked open weight; GPT-5.6 Terra is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Terra understand images?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is documented with image input; GPT-5.6 Terra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5.1 is 128K and GPT-5.6 Terra is 128K.
Do Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Terra support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.6 Terra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
Claude Fable 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; GPT-5.6 Terra has 2, so GPT-5.6 Terra has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Terra?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.