Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy4 preview

Why this pair: New open-weight Tencent flagship versus Anthropic's current frontier model

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Fable 5.1Verified Sep 2, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldClaude Fable 5.1Hy4 preview
DeveloperAnthropicTencent
FamilyClaude 5 1Hy4
ModelClaude Fable 5.1Hy4 preview
VersionClaude Fable 5.1Hy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-09-012026-08-28
Knowledge cutoff2026-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000,0001,000,000
Total parametersUnknown770,000,000,000
Active parametersUnknown49,000,000,000
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Fable 5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-fable-5-1

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5.1 and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced input price: $0.834 per million tokens. Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced output price: $2.501 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Fable 5.1 is 1,000,000 and Hy4 preview is 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Hy4 preview is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Fable 5.1 is not marked open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Claude Fable 5.1 and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Claude Fable 5.1 is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5.1 is 128,000 and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Claude Fable 5.1 and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Fable 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

Claude Fable 5.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Hy4 preview has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5.1 or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback