Bonsai Image Binary 4B vs Grok Build 0.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $2.00Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 256K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 18, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Bonsai Image Binary 4B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | PrismML | xAI |
| Family | Bonsai Image 4b | Grok Build |
| Model | Bonsai Image Binary 4B | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Bonsai Image Binary 4B | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Image | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 256K |
| Total parameters | 4B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
| Base model | FLUX.2 Klein 4B | Unknown |
| Default resolution | 512 × 512 | Unknown |
| Transformer size | 0.93 GB | Unknown |
| Weight format | Binary weights with FP16 group scales | Unknown |
Bonsai Image Binary 4B Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peers |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage |
Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peers |
Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peers |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Bonsai Image Binary 4BPrismML | cross-developer peersimage |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Bonsai Image Binary 4B vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Bonsai Image Binary 4B and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only Grok Build 0.1 has a directly sourced output price: $2.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Bonsai Image Binary 4B is — and Grok Build 0.1 is 256K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Bonsai Image Binary 4B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Bonsai Image Binary 4B is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Bonsai Image Binary 4B and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Bonsai Image Binary 4B is not documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Bonsai Image Binary 4B is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Bonsai Image Binary 4B and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Bonsai Image Binary 4B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Bonsai Image Binary 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Grok Build 0.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Bonsai Image Binary 4B or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.