Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium vs GLM 5.3 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  Stable Diffusion 3.5 MediumStability AI |  GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #29 of 4654.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.4–69.8 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #2 of 44$0.0087 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #1 of 3877.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 68.2–84.9 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.075Z.ai ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.25Z.ai ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 0K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Stability AI | Z.ai |
| Family | Stable Diffusion 3 5 Medium | Glm 5 3 Flash |
| Model | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium | GLM-5.3-Flash |
| Version | stable-diffusion-3.5-medium | GLM-5.3-Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2024-10-29 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Document |
| Output modalities | Image | Text |
| Context window | 0K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 2.5B | 320B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 18B |
| License | other | MIT |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Stability AI (Pay as you go) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peers |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage |
 Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peers |
stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peers |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | stable-diffusion-3.5-mediumStability AI | cross-developer peersimage |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium vs GLM 5.3 Flash FAQs
Is Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and GLM 5.3 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.075 per million tokens. Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $0.25 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium supports 0K and GLM 5.3 Flash supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is open weight; GLM 5.3 Flash is open weight.
Can Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and GLM 5.3 Flash understand images?+
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is not documented with image input; GLM 5.3 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium is — and GLM 5.3 Flash is 131K.
Do Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and GLM 5.3 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium: none of these features are definitively sourced. GLM 5.3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 Flash has 4, so GLM 5.3 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium or GLM 5.3 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.