Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#24 of 4660.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#31 of 44$0.198 per LiveBench case#13 of 44$0.057 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#31 of 3847.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.475Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$15.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$4.425Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-1.52100% of row best · score · Claude Sonnet 4.6; 95% CI [-2.63863180, -0.39612153]; sessions 39452; observations 1444102; rank 31-3.6398% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Max; 95% CI [-4.47002493, -2.78058186]; sessions 38392; observations 1816729; rank 34
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader77.1199% of row best · percent · claude-sonnet-4-6-thinking-auto-medium-effort · 13,226 output tokens / case77.50100% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified83.63100% of row best · points · Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 18,675 output tokens / case81.2697% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (default) · 8,636 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7 Max
DeveloperAnthropicQwen
FamilyClaude 4Qwen3 7
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7 Max
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.7 Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-172026-05-20
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Max FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 and Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15.00 and Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 1,000K and Qwen3.7 Max is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Max understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 128K and Qwen3.7 Max supports 66K output tokens.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.7 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Max has 4, so Qwen3.7 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback