Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Astra
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#16 of 2260.3 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#25 of 36$0.198 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#17 of 2246.0 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader86.5088% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)98.50100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (XHigh)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader60.4264% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)95.00100% of row best · percent · GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Anthropic · activeClaude Sonnet 4.6Verified Sep 3, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-6 AstraVerified Sep 4, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Astra
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaude 4Gpt 6
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Astra
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-172026-09-03
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-012026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,050K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

15 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$3.00
Output price$15.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 and GPT-6 Astra is $10.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15.00 and GPT-6 Astra is $50.00 per million tokens, so Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not marked open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 128K and GPT-6 Astra is 128K.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback