Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#24 of 4660.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#31 of 44$0.198 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#31 of 3847.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$15.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$3.00Google AI · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,049K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3 Flash
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,482.24100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1476.36427265, 1488.10617859]; votes 57813; rank 111,412.9995% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash; 95% CI [1403.58694998, 1422.40270038]; votes 7158; rank 40
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,221.23100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6-search; 95% CI [1216.39472071, 1226.06821163]; votes 134905; rank 71,198.0998% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash-grounding; 95% CI [1193.35426288, 1202.82591975]; votes 149334; rank 15
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,458.26100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1454.67519650, 1461.85096774]; votes 66208; rank 351,442.4099% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1439.30492660, 1445.49388279]; votes 85799; rank 61
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,282.72100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1276.36460283, 1289.07266013]; votes 25552; rank 271,265.3799% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1259.84136462, 1270.89646969]; votes 34860; rank 41
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above4 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3 Flash
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaude 4Gemini 3
ModelClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3 Flash
VersionClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3 Flash
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-02-17Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,049K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3-flash-preview

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Flash FAQs

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 and Gemini 3 Flash is $0.50 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15.00 and Gemini 3 Flash is $3.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

Gemini 3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000K and Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not marked open weight; Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash understand images?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is documented with image input; Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 128K and Gemini 3 Flash supports 66K output tokens.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3 Flash has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Gemini 3 Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback