Seed 2.1 Evolving vs Hy4 preview

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 2.1 EvolvingVerified Sep 3, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldSeed 2.1 EvolvingHy4 preview
DeveloperByteDance SeedTencent
FamilySeed 2 1Hy4
ModelSeed 2.1 EvolvingHy4 preview
VersionSeed 2.1 EvolvingHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-06-232026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown1,000K
Total parametersUnknown770B
Active parametersUnknown49B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Seed 2.1 Evolving Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.1-evolving

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.1 Evolving vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Evolving and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced input price: $0.834 per million tokens. Only Hy4 preview has a directly sourced output price: $2.501 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Evolving is — and Hy4 preview is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Hy4 preview is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.1 Evolving is not marked open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Seed 2.1 Evolving and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Seed 2.1 Evolving is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Evolving is — and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Seed 2.1 Evolving and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.1 Evolving: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

Seed 2.1 Evolving has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Hy4 preview has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback