Seed 2.1 Evolving vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Seed 2.1 Evolving | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #22 of 36$0.161 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.1 Evolving | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Seed 2 1 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | Seed 2.1 Evolving | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Version | Seed 2.1 Evolving | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-06-23 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
11 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Seed 2.1 Evolving Capabilities
Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.1 Evolving vs Gemini 3.1 Pro FAQs
Is Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.1 Evolving and Gemini 3.1 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Only Gemini 3.1 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.1 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $12.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.1 Evolving is — and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.1 Evolving is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight.
Can Seed 2.1 Evolving and Gemini 3.1 Pro understand images?+
Seed 2.1 Evolving is documented with image input; Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.1 Evolving is — and Gemini 3.1 Pro is 66K.
Do Seed 2.1 Evolving and Gemini 3.1 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.1 Evolving: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
Seed 2.1 Evolving has 0 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2, so Gemini 3.1 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.1 Evolving or Gemini 3.1 Pro?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.