Seed 2.0 Mini vs Ternary Bonsai 8B
At a Glance
| Compare | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | Ternary Bonsai 8BPrismML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.10Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.40Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 66K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 18, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.0 Mini | Ternary Bonsai 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | PrismML |
| Family | Seed 2 0 | Bonsai 8b |
| Model | Seed 2.0 Mini | Ternary Bonsai 8B |
| Version | Seed 2.0 Mini | Ternary Bonsai 8B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2026-04-18 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 66K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 8.2B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation |
| Effective bit width | Unknown | 1.58 bits per weight |
| Weight size | Unknown | 2.18 GB |
| Weight format | Unknown | Ternary Q2_0 |
Seed 2.0 Mini Capabilities
Ternary Bonsai 8B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.0 Mini vs Ternary Bonsai 8B FAQs
Is Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Mini and Ternary Bonsai 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
Only Seed 2.0 Mini has a directly sourced input price: $0.10 per million tokens. Only Seed 2.0 Mini has a directly sourced output price: $0.40 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Ternary Bonsai 8B is 66K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B be self-hosted?+
Ternary Bonsai 8B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.0 Mini is not marked open weight; Ternary Bonsai 8B is open weight.
Can Seed 2.0 Mini and Ternary Bonsai 8B understand images?+
Seed 2.0 Mini is documented with image input; Ternary Bonsai 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Ternary Bonsai 8B is —.
Do Seed 2.0 Mini and Ternary Bonsai 8B support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.0 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Ternary Bonsai 8B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
Seed 2.0 Mini has 1 sourced provider route; Ternary Bonsai 8B has 0, so Seed 2.0 Mini has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Mini or Ternary Bonsai 8B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.