Seed 2.0 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Max
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Seed 2.0 Mini | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 2.0 Mini | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | Qwen |
| Family | Seed 2 0 | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Seed 2.0 Mini | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Seed 2.0 Mini | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
12 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Seed 2.0 Mini Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text, video |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 2.0 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Mini and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.10 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Mini is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.40 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Mini is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.0 Mini is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Seed 2.0 Mini and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Seed 2.0 Mini is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.
Do Seed 2.0 Mini and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 2.0 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Seed 2.0 Mini has 1 sourced provider route; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Mini or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.