Seed 2.0 Mini vs Jev

At a Glance

Compare
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed
JevTypeSafe
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.10Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.042TypeSafe · Sep 17, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.40Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.000TypeSafe · Sep 17, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported64K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 17, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldSeed 2.0 MiniJev
DeveloperByteDance SeedTypeSafe
FamilySeed 2 0Jev
ModelSeed 2.0 MiniJev
VersionSeed 2.0 MiniJev
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-142026-09-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Model-specific input
Output modalitiesTextModel-specific input
Context windowUnknown64K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)TypeSafe (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolscalibrated-confidence, parallel-evaluation, structured_outputs, typed-decisions
Maximum Choice cardinalityUnknown255 options
Default request rate limitUnknown1200 requests per minute
State plus longest question limitUnknown32000 tokens
Combined state and questions limitUnknown64000 tokens
Default token rate limitUnknown250000 tokens per second

Seed 2.0 Mini Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.0-mini

Jev Capabilities

calibrated-confidenceparallel-evaluationstructured outputstyped-decisions
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtypesafe/jev

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.0 Mini vs Jev FAQs

Is Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Mini and Jev, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.10 and Jev is $0.042 per million tokens, so Jev is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.40 and Jev is $0.000 per million tokens, so Jev is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Jev is 64K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.0 Mini is not marked open weight; Jev is not marked open weight.

Can Seed 2.0 Mini and Jev understand images?+

Seed 2.0 Mini is documented with image input; Jev is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Jev is —.

Do Seed 2.0 Mini and Jev support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.0 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Jev: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

Seed 2.0 Mini has 1 sourced provider route; Jev has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Mini or Jev?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback