Seed 2.0 Mini vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.10Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.0825Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.40Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.33Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldSeed 2.0 MiniHy3
DeveloperByteDance SeedTencent
FamilySeed 2 0Hy3
ModelSeed 2.0 MiniHy3
VersionSeed 2.0 MiniHy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-14Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, tools

Seed 2.0 Mini Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.0-mini

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.0 Mini vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Mini and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.10 and Hy3 is $0.0825 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. Seed 2.0 Mini is $0.40 and Hy3 is $0.33 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Hy3 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 2.0 Mini is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Seed 2.0 Mini and Hy3 understand images?+

Seed 2.0 Mini is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Mini is — and Hy3 is —.

Do Seed 2.0 Mini and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.0 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

Seed 2.0 Mini has 1 sourced provider route; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Mini or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback