Seed 1.8 vs Gemma 4 31B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Seed 1.8 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | ByteDance Seed | Google Deepmind |
| Family | Seed 1 8 | Gemma 4 |
| Model | Seed 1.8 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Version | Seed 1.8 | Gemma 4 31B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-03-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Unknown |
| Output modalities | Text | Unknown |
| Context window | Unknown | 262,144 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 31,000,000,000 |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
9 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met
Seed 1.8 Capabilities
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text |
Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed | vs | Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed | family variantsimage, text |
 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Seed 1.8 vs Gemma 4 31B FAQs
Is Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 1.8 and Gemma 4 31B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
Only Gemma 4 31B has a directly sourced input price: $0.090 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 31B has a directly sourced output price: $0.34 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 1.8 is — and Gemma 4 31B is 262,144.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Seed 1.8 is not marked open weight; Gemma 4 31B is open weight.
Can Seed 1.8 and Gemma 4 31B understand images?+
Seed 1.8 is documented with image input; Gemma 4 31B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 1.8 is — and Gemma 4 31B is —.
Do Seed 1.8 and Gemma 4 31B support reasoning and tool use?+
Seed 1.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemma 4 31B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
Seed 1.8 has 0 sourced provider routes; Gemma 4 31B has 5, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Seed 1.8 or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.