Seed 1.8 vs Seed 2.0 Mini

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 1.8Verified Sep 3, 2026
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 2.0 MiniVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldSeed 1.8Seed 2.0 Mini
DeveloperByteDance SeedByteDance Seed
FamilySeed 1 8Seed 2 0
ModelSeed 1.8Seed 2.0 Mini
VersionSeed 1.8Seed 2.0 Mini
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-02-14
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknownUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

11 comparable fields · 5 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Seed 1.8 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-1.8

Seed 2.0 Mini Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.10
Output price$0.40
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.0-mini

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 1.8 vs Seed 2.0 Mini FAQs

Is Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 1.8 and Seed 2.0 Mini, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

Only Seed 2.0 Mini has a directly sourced input price: $0.10 per million tokens. Only Seed 2.0 Mini has a directly sourced output price: $0.40 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 1.8 is — and Seed 2.0 Mini is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 1.8 is not marked open weight; Seed 2.0 Mini is not marked open weight.

Can Seed 1.8 and Seed 2.0 Mini understand images?+

Seed 1.8 is documented with image input; Seed 2.0 Mini is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 1.8 is — and Seed 2.0 Mini is —.

Do Seed 1.8 and Seed 2.0 Mini support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 1.8: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Seed 2.0 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

Seed 1.8 has 0 sourced provider routes; Seed 2.0 Mini has 1, so Seed 2.0 Mini has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 1.8 or Seed 2.0 Mini?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback