Gemma 4 31B vs Grok Build 0.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · leader | -22.3388% of row best · score · Gemma 4 31B; 95% CI [-25.65092528, -19.00692476]; sessions 56661; observations 703574; rank 56 | -11.31100% of row best · score · Grok Build 0.1; 95% CI [-12.50212956, -10.11963476]; sessions 74459; observations 5587414; rank 53 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 31B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google Deepmind | Xai |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Grok Build |
| Model | Gemma 4 31B | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Version | Gemma 4 31B | Grok Build 0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-05-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Output modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Context window | 262,144 | 256,000 |
| Total parameters | 31,000,000,000 | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 31B vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs
Is Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 31B and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Only Gemma 4 31B has a directly sourced input price: $0.090 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 31B has a directly sourced output price: $0.34 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Gemma 4 31B has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 31B supports 262,144 and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemma 4 31B is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Gemma 4 31B and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+
Gemma 4 31B is not documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 31B is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.
Do Gemma 4 31B and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 31B: reasoning and tool calling. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
Gemma 4 31B has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 31B or Grok Build 0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.