Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3 Coder NextQwen | Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.12Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.14Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.80Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $1.00Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen3 Coder Next | Qwen3 5 35b A3b |
| Model | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
| Version | Qwen3-Coder-Next | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-02 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 79.7B | 36B |
| Active parameters | 3B | 3B |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Qwen3 Coder Next Capabilities
Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B FAQs
Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.5 35B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.12 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $0.14 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.80 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $1.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3 Coder Next is 262K and Qwen3.5 35B A3B is 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight.
Can Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.5 35B A3B understand images?+
Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 Coder Next is — and Qwen3.5 35B A3B is —.
Do Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3.5 35B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.