Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Qwen · activeQwen3 Coder NextVerified Aug 28, 2026
Mistral AI · activeMistral Large 3Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldQwen3-Coder-NextMistral Large 3
DeveloperQwenMistral AI
FamilyQwen3 Coder NextMistral Large 3
ModelQwen3-Coder-NextMistral Large 3
VersionQwen3-Coder-NextMistral Large 3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-022025-12-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters79.7B675B
Active parameters3B41B
Licenseapache-2.0Apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

17 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Qwen3 Coder Next Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price$0.12
Output price$0.80
Serving providers2
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.50
Output price$1.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs

Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.12 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.80 and Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3 Coder Next is 262K and Mistral Large 3 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 Coder Next is — and Mistral Large 3 is —.

Do Qwen3 Coder Next and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback