Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 3.1 8B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.12Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.80Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-8B
DeveloperQwenMeta
FamilyQwen3 Coder NextLlama 3 1 8b
ModelQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-8B
VersionQwen3-Coder-NextLlama-3.1-8B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-022024-07-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters79.7B8B
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0llama3.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsgeneration

Qwen3 Coder Next Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next

Llama 3.1 8B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 3.1 8B FAQs

Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

Only Qwen3 Coder Next has a directly sourced input price: $0.12 per million tokens. Only Qwen3 Coder Next has a directly sourced output price: $0.80 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 Coder Next supports 262K and Llama 3.1 8B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Llama 3.1 8B is open weight.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 8B understand images?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Llama 3.1 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 Coder Next is — and Llama 3.1 8B is —.

Do Qwen3 Coder Next and Llama 3.1 8B support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Llama 3.1 8B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 8B has 1, so Qwen3 Coder Next has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next or Llama 3.1 8B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback