Qwen3 Coder Next vs Granite 4.2 8B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.12Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026$0.060Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.80Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026$0.25Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 2, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3-Coder-NextGranite 4.2 8B
DeveloperQwenIBM
FamilyQwen3 Coder NextGranite 4 2
ModelQwen3-Coder-NextGranite 4.2 8B
VersionQwen3-Coder-NextGranite 4.2 8B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-022026-08-25
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters79.7B8.8B
Active parameters3BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Qwen3 Coder Next Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next

Granite 4.2 8B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Granite 4.2 8B FAQs

Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next and Granite 4.2 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.12 and Granite 4.2 8B is $0.060 per million tokens, so Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3 Coder Next is $0.80 and Granite 4.2 8B is $0.25 per million tokens, so Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3 Coder Next supports 262K and Granite 4.2 8B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next is open weight; Granite 4.2 8B is open weight.

Can Qwen3 Coder Next and Granite 4.2 8B understand images?+

Qwen3 Coder Next is not documented with image input; Granite 4.2 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3 Coder Next is — and Granite 4.2 8B is —.

Do Qwen3 Coder Next and Granite 4.2 8B support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3 Coder Next: tool calling. Granite 4.2 8B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

Qwen3 Coder Next has 2 sourced provider routes; Granite 4.2 8B has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next or Granite 4.2 8B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback