Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok Build 0.1

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingQwen3.8-MaxGrok Build 0.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case#1 of 36$0.0020 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkQwen3.8-MaxGrok Build 0.1
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · leader6.01100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [4.88117795, 7.13339178]; sessions 18386; observations 1372080; rank 14-11.3184% of row best · score · Grok Build 0.1; 95% CI [-12.50212956, -10.11963476]; sessions 74459; observations 5587414; rank 53
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.88100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case71.0987% of row best · percent · grok-build-0.1 · 980 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Qwen · activeQwen3.8 MaxVerified Aug 29, 2026
xAI · previewGrok Build 0.1Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldQwen3.8-MaxGrok Build 0.1
DeveloperQwenxAI
FamilyQwen3 8 MaxGrok Build
ModelQwen3.8-MaxGrok Build 0.1
VersionQwen3.8-MaxGrok Build 0.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknown2026-05-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K256K
Total parameters2.4TUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.65
Output price$4.951
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.00
Output price$2.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-build-0.1

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs

Is Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 Max and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

Qwen3.8 Max leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.8 Max and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+

Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 Max is 131K and Grok Build 0.1 is —.

Do Qwen3.8 Max and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

Qwen3.8 Max has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 Max or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback