Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #16 of 36$0.086 per LiveBench case | #19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,437.3597% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-27b; 95% CI [1429.71618499, 1444.98971204]; votes 6626; rank 69 | 1,479.56100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1473.34740586, 1485.77213629]; votes 13136; rank 12 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,279.3297% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-27b; 95% CI [1267.46655532, 1291.16933290]; votes 2954; rank 28 | 1,312.86100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1304.57707433, 1321.13715544]; votes 7244; rank 6 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 78.0295% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-27b · 28,740 output tokens / case | 81.88100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen3 8 27b | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Qwen3.8-27B | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 27.8B | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Qwen3.8 27B Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3.8-27BQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 27B is $0.40 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 27B is $3.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 27B supports 262K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Qwen3.8 27B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.8 27B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Qwen3.8 27B is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 27B is 131K and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.
Do Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.8 27B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 27B has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.