Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy4 preview
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Qwen3.8-27B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #16 of 36$0.086 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.8-27B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Tencent |
| Family | Qwen3 8 27b | Hy4 |
| Model | Qwen3.8-27B | Hy4 preview |
| Version | Qwen3.8-27B | Hy4 preview |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-08-28 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 27.8B | 770B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
15 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Qwen3.8 27B Capabilities
Hy4 preview Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Qwen3.8-27BQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Qwen3.8-27BQwen | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy4 preview FAQs
Is Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 27B and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
Qwen3.8 27B is $0.40 and Hy4 preview is $0.834 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 27B is $3.00 and Hy4 preview is $2.501 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
Hy4 preview has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 27B supports 262K and Hy4 preview supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.8 27B is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.
Can Qwen3.8 27B and Hy4 preview understand images?+
Qwen3.8 27B is documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 27B is 131K and Hy4 preview is —.
Do Qwen3.8 27B and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.8 27B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
Qwen3.8 27B has 3 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Qwen3.8 27B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 27B or Hy4 preview?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.