Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT
At a Glance
| Compare |  ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PTBaidu | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.00Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $6.00Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Baidu |
| Family | Qwen3 8 2 4t A95b | Ernie 4 5 0 3b Pt |
| Model | Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT |
| Version | Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | ERNIE-4.5-0.3B-PT |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 2.4T | 360.7M |
| Active parameters | 95B | Unknown |
| License | other | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation |
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Capabilities
ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantstext | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT FAQs
Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a directly sourced output price: $6.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B supports 262K and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is open weight; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is open weight.
Can Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT understand images?+
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is not documented with image input; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is — and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT is —.
Do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: reasoning and tool calling. ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has 5 sourced provider routes; ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT has 0, so Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or ERNIE 4.5 0.3B PT?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.