Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B vs Hy4 preview

Why this pair: Large open-weight mixture-of-experts models from Tencent and Qwen

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Qwen · activeQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BVerified Aug 28, 2026
Tencent · previewHy4 previewVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
DeveloperQwenTencent
FamilyQwen3 8 2 4t A95bHy4
ModelQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
VersionQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknown2026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262,1441,000,000
Total parameters2,446,182,725,504770,000,000,000
Active parameters95,000,000,00049,000,000,000
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

16 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.834
Output price$2.501
Serving providers1
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vsfamily variantstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is $2.00 and Hy4 preview is $0.834 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is $6.00 and Hy4 preview is $2.501 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Hy4 preview has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B supports 262,144 and Hy4 preview supports 1,000,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is not documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is — and Hy4 preview is —.

Do Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B: reasoning and tool calling. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B has 2 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 1, so Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback