Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Hy4 preview

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.00Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 5, 2026$0.834Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$6.00Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 5, 2026$2.501Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 2, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
DeveloperQwenTencent
FamilyQwen3 8 2 4t A95bHy4
ModelQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
VersionQwen3.8-2.4T-A95BHy4 preview
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknown2026-08-28
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters2.45T770B
Active parameters95B49B
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Hy4 preview Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDtencent/Hy4-preview

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Hy4 preview FAQs

Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Hy4 preview, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $2.00 and Hy4 preview is $0.7506 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $6.00 and Hy4 preview is $2.2509 per million tokens, so Hy4 preview is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Hy4 preview has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B supports 262,144 tokens and Hy4 preview supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is open weight; Hy4 preview is open weight.

Can Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Hy4 preview understand images?+

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is not documented with image input; Hy4 preview is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Hy4 preview support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: reasoning and tool calling. Hy4 preview: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has 5 sourced provider routes; Hy4 preview has 2, so Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Hy4 preview?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback