Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.45Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.00Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Qwen3 5 397b A17b | Gemini 3 |
| Model | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Version | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-15 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 403.4B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 17B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | automated-patching, cybersecurity, reasoning, vulnerability-detection |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Capabilities
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber FAQs
Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a directly sourced input price: $0.45 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a directly sourced output price: $3.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 262K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber be self-hosted?+
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open weight; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber understand images?+
Qwen3.5 397B A17B is documented with image input; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is — and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.5 397B A17B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 4 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber has 0, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.