Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench case
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.45Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.15DeepSeek · Sep 10, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.60Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 10, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-397B-A17BDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeveloperQwenDeepSeek
FamilyQwen3 5 397b A17bDeepseek V4 1
ModelQwen3.5-397B-A17BDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
VersionQwen3.5-397B-A17BDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-152026-09-10
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters403.4B763.2B
Active parameters17BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, vision
Architecture designUnknownCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers)
Backbone parametersUnknown552000000000 parameters
Active parameters during decodeUnknown16000000000 parameters
Active parameters during prefillUnknown8000000000 parameters
Pre-training corpusUnknown45000000000000 tokens
Reasoning effort rangeUnknown1–100
Routed experts per MoE layerUnknown384 experts
Routed experts per tokenUnknown6 experts
Transformer layersUnknown40 layers

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities

agentschatfimgenerationreasoningresponsesstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.45 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $3.00 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports 262K and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open weight; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash understand images?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is — and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 393K.

Do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 4 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback