Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Codestral 22B v0.1

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Codestral 22B v0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a directly sourced input price: $0.45 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a directly sourced output price: $3.00 per million tokens.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports 262K and Codestral 22B v0.1 supports 33K.

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open weight; Codestral 22B v0.1 is open weight.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is documented with image input; Codestral 22B v0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is — and Codestral 22B v0.1 is —.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Codestral 22B v0.1: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 4 sourced provider routes; Codestral 22B v0.1 has 0, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B has broader tracked availability.

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.