Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Sonnet 5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#26 of 4660.1 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 40.0–73.4
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#29 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#30 of 3847.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 37.4–54.0
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.45Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$2.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$10.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.5-397B-A17BClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,438.26100% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-397b-a17b; 95% CI [1434.97391785, 1441.55191176]; votes 77007; rank 711,442.15100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1437.57467941, 1446.71829948]; votes 35301; rank 62
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,265.1599% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-397b-a17b; 95% CI [1259.44632362, 1270.86149272]; votes 27569; rank 421,277.16100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-5-high; 95% CI [1269.57643110, 1284.74576666]; votes 10289; rank 32
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties0 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.5-397B-A17BClaude Sonnet 5
DeveloperQwenAnthropic
FamilyQwen3 5 397b A17bClaude 5
ModelQwen3.5-397B-A17BClaude Sonnet 5
VersionQwen3.5-397B-A17BClaude Sonnet 5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-152026-06-30
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters403.4BUnknown
Active parameters17BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Claude Sonnet 5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Sonnet 5 FAQs

Is Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Sonnet 5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.45 and Claude Sonnet 5 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $3.00 and Claude Sonnet 5 is $10.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports 262K and Claude Sonnet 5 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: Neither model leads outside the score tolerance on the verified common benchmarks.

Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5 be self-hosted?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open weight; Claude Sonnet 5 is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Sonnet 5 understand images?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is — and Claude Sonnet 5 is 128K.

Do Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Sonnet 5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has 4 sourced provider routes; Claude Sonnet 5 has 3, so Qwen3.5 397B A17B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Sonnet 5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback