pi 0.7 vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
pi 0.7Physical Intelligence
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported262K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldpi 0.7Hy3
DeveloperPhysical IntelligenceTencent
FamilypiHy3
Modelpi 0.7Hy3
Version0.7Hy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-16Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Robot stateText
Output modalitiesRobot actionText
Context windowUnknown262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableUnknownYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiescross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, language-steering, visual-subgoalschat, generation, tools
Robotics model typeVision-language-action modelUnknown
Action representationContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal promptsUnknown
Control architectureHigh-level policy, world model, and action expertUnknown
Inference locationUnknownUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsmobile manipulators, bimanual UR5e, multiple fixed manipulatorsUnknown
Training dataRobot demonstrations, autonomous data, egocentric human data, and multimodal web data described by the publisher.Unknown

pi 0.7 Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationlanguage-steeringvisual-subgoals
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceUnknown
Action representationContinuous robot actions conditioned by multimodal prompts
Supported embodiments3
Canonical IDphysical-intelligence/pi-0.7

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

pi 0.7 vs Hy3 FAQs

Is pi 0.7 or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both pi 0.7 and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

Only Hy3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.13 per million tokens. Only Hy3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.528 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. pi 0.7 is — and Hy3 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can pi 0.7 or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Hy3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. pi 0.7 is not marked open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can pi 0.7 and Hy3 understand images?+

pi 0.7 is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. pi 0.7 is — and Hy3 is —.

Do pi 0.7 and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

pi 0.7: image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

pi 0.7 has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, pi 0.7 or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback