Claude Opus 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#11 of 4679.0 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#37 of 44$0.286 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#20 of 3852.7 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.090Upstage · Sep 18, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$25.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.36Upstage · Sep 18, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K524K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 18, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Opus 4.7Solar Pro 4
DeveloperAnthropicUpstage
FamilyClaude 4Solar Pro
ModelClaude Opus 4.7Solar Pro 4
VersionClaude Opus 4.7Solar Pro 4
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-162026-08-14
Knowledge cutoff2026-01-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K524K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Upstage (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools
Supported languagesUnknownEnglish, Korean, Japanese
Training data cutoffUnknownFebruary 2026

Claude Opus 4.7 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-7

Solar Pro 4 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDupstage/solar-pro-4

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4 FAQs

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.7 and Solar Pro 4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

Claude Opus 4.7 is $5.00 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.090 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.7 is $25.00 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.36 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000K and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4 be self-hosted?+

Solar Pro 4 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Opus 4.7 is not marked open weight; Solar Pro 4 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Opus 4.7 and Solar Pro 4 understand images?+

Claude Opus 4.7 is documented with image input; Solar Pro 4 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

Solar Pro 4 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Opus 4.7 supports 128K and Solar Pro 4 supports 131K output tokens.

Do Claude Opus 4.7 and Solar Pro 4 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Opus 4.7: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Solar Pro 4: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

Claude Opus 4.7 has 2 sourced provider routes; Solar Pro 4 has 1, so Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.7 or Solar Pro 4?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback