Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.6
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | #6 of 2278.9 score | #13 of 2267.6 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #31 of 36$0.286 per LiveBench case | #18 of 36$0.097 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | #12 of 2251.8 score | #8 of 2256.6 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-15fb467fd4fc · verified_score · leader | 93.50100% of row best · percent · Claude 4.7 (High) | 87.5094% of row best · percent · Grok 4.6 (Medium) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9a3db289984e · verified_score · leader | 75.83100% of row best · percent · Claude 4.7 (Max) | 67.0888% of row best · percent · Grok 4.6 (XHigh) |
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · statistical tie | 6.33100% of row best · score · Claude Opus 4.7; 95% CI [4.91001873, 7.74575053]; sessions 37121; observations 1470793; rank 10 | 5.7699% of row best · score · Grok 4.6 (xHigh); 95% CI [4.47058991, 7.04827601]; sessions 15090; observations 1574671; rank 16 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,483.21100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-7; 95% CI [1479.33960820, 1487.07067536]; votes 61256; rank 10 | 1,443.7597% of row best · rating · grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1433.62910542, 1453.86294509]; votes 3453; rank 55 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 80.9799% of row best · percent · claude-opus-4-7-xhigh-effort · 11,460 output tokens / case | 82.17100% of row best · percent · grok-4.6 · 16,154 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 85.4999% of row best · points · Claude Opus 4.7 · 2,578 output tokens / case | 86.61100% of row best · points · Grok 4.6 · 15,575 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead | 2 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | xAI |
| Family | Claude 4 | Grok 4 |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.6 |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-01-01 | 2026-02-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 500K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Claude Opus 4.7 Capabilities
Grok 4.6 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.6 FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.7 is $5.00 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.6 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.7 is $25.00 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so Grok 4.6 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1,000K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.7 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 6 protocol-matched benchmarks from 4 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.7 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.6 understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.7 is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.7 is 128K and Grok 4.6 is —.
Do Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.7: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
Claude Opus 4.7 has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.7 or Grok 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.