Claude Opus 4.6 vs Seed 2.0 Code
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #12 of 4676.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #33 of 44$0.241 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #19 of 3853.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.50Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $3.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Opus 4.6 | Seed 2.0 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | ByteDance Seed |
| Family | Claude 4 | Seed 2 0 |
| Model | Claude Opus 4.6 | Seed 2.0 Code |
| Version | Claude Opus 4.6 | Seed 2.0 Code |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-05 | 2026-02-14 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-05-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Claude Opus 4.6 Capabilities
Seed 2.0 Code Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Seed 2.0 Code FAQs
Is Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Opus 4.6 and Seed 2.0 Code, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
Claude Opus 4.6 is $5.00 and Seed 2.0 Code is $0.50 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Code is cheaper on this metric. Claude Opus 4.6 is $25.00 and Seed 2.0 Code is $3.00 per million tokens, so Seed 2.0 Code is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Claude Opus 4.6 is 1,000K and Seed 2.0 Code is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Opus 4.6 is not marked open weight; Seed 2.0 Code is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Opus 4.6 and Seed 2.0 Code understand images?+
Claude Opus 4.6 is documented with image input; Seed 2.0 Code is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Opus 4.6 is 128K and Seed 2.0 Code is —.
Do Claude Opus 4.6 and Seed 2.0 Code support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Opus 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Seed 2.0 Code: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
Claude Opus 4.6 has 1 sourced provider route; Seed 2.0 Code has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Claude Opus 4.6 or Seed 2.0 Code?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.